LCG Scribe


The lesson of the American Experience
August 21, 2009, 12:21 pm
Filed under: Kingdom of God, Politics, Religion, United States | Tags: , , ,

ark_of_covenant_butThis excellent article (from the Tomorrow’s World Web site) on America’s alleged status as a Christian nation (past or present) is relevant to many, many things that are happening in our society now, not least our current crises in health care, economics, governmental ethics and religious freedom. That article raised a question in my mind: is there something we can learn from the American Experience — something that most Americans seem to be missing, from our political and religious leadership on down to the citizenry?

I’ve long maintained that our Founding Generation’s fundamental mistake lay in attempting to found a nation on essentially Christian ethics apart from either genuinely Christian government or genuinely Christian religion. Even its ethical foundation was flawed (as the above article notes also), in that it never took into account all of the Ten Commandments and the statutes and judgments that depend on them.  Moreover, its republican form of government with its separation of church and state (and I mean in the Jeffersonian sense as expressed in his Bill for Religious Freedom in Virginia, not in the modern revisionist sense) has nothing to do with the principles of God’s government as summarized in the Ark of the Covenant. The Bible demands obedience to (and prophesies the coming of) a genuine theocratic monarchy, not some other form of government.

To their credit, the American Founding Generation recognized that they couldn’t bring about a genuine theocratic monarchy of themselves and saw that no one else had ever done so of their own power either. But somehow, they remained blind to the fact that a genuine theocratic monarchy did exist — in ancient Israel — and that when people submitted fully to its authority, people prospered tremendously in every way. The only weakness of perfect human government is imperfect human nature, and that’s what Israel’s and Judah’s overall experience proved for all time; yet the American experience teaches a corollary lesson. That lesson is that no degree or kind of merely human, political checks and balances will substitute for human nature being subject to God’s sovereign will, nor will it create that subjection.

Another corollary is something that Americans as a whole find all but impossible to face. Thomas Jefferson was wrong, dead wrong: truth will not win out over error simply because truth is given a free voice in public debate. In a world ruled invisibly by Satan, without God working through human individuals and human authority to establish His will, evil will impose its will by force or by subtlety or both, every time. That too history proves over and over again.

Peace in Jesus Christ (שלום בישוע המשיח),
John Wheeler (יוחנן רכב)


5 Comments so far
Leave a comment

[...] This article on America’s status as a Christian nation (to which the former article is linked) is most relevant too, but so much more could be said on that topic. I say something more from my own perspective on this morning’s edition of LCG Scribe. [...]

Pingback by Is there a solution to the health care crisis? « The Chronicles of Johanan Rakkav

Thought provoking! Thank you for sharing.

Comment by Amanda Howard

The founding fathers were influenced by the philosophy of John Locke and the theology of Deism.

God did not establish America as a Bible based theocracy, because He had already proven that test with ancient Israel.

The American experiment is unique, nonetheless. It puts responsibility square on the shoulders of the American people. The national character, if you will.

Sadly, our nation has been failing the test. And punishment for national sins is coming – for which our nation will have no excuse.

People like to talk about “God’s plan for mankind.” Well, God does indeed have a master plan. It’s been working out over the ages, but so many people are ignorant of it.

Comment by Steve

I wondering if Ancient Israel is better described as a theocratic Republic. It is clear that the people were represented by tribe in the national government. James Madison knew ancient Hebrew and used it for the express purpose of studying the structure of Ancient Israel. Our nation is commonly referred to as “a nation founded on Judeo-Christian principles” goes much further than being a nation founded on the 10 Commandments. Any thoughts on, the purpose of the Am and the assemblies of the peoples (representatives of the tribes) and how the related to the making and unmaking of Kings?

Comment by Ethel B. Fwank

Dear Ethel,

At least one of the Founding Fathers, a preacher, argued strenuously that if one was really a Christian, then one would have to be a republican. He probably would argue too that ancient Israel was a republic.

It’s easy for some to confuse Israel’s theocratic monarchy with a republic because a basic principle of God’s government is input from the governed. But that in no way implies the voting, political checks and balances, and party spirit implicity in republicanism. Let me review some of the reasons why.

Before Israel had a king, Moses appointed judges over the people of Israel (Exodus 18). Yet since he didn’t know who was qualified, he asked the people to choose men who were (Deuteronomy 1), and these he then appointed. Yet the people’s choice was by complete consensus, not by majority rule. There was no election, no formal accountability of the judges to the people as well as to God, as there would be were Israel a republic. Then, God was their King, and everybody in the human chain of command was accountable to Him and to those humans above them.

The civil and priestly responsibilities were divided humanly under the heads of Moses and Aaron. As a further check, God raised up Miriam the prophetess, who was independent of the power structure. This basic pattern continued throughout Old Testament history, with the king taking the place of the chief judge in time. Kings could be appointed by the people, but again this was due to his qualifications, never (save in times when God wasn’t blessing the effort) due to the desires of the people. The Torah insists that the king must be someone the Lord, not man, chooses. Man simply sees “by the fruits” who is qualified (and part of that fruit had to do with the promised descent through the line of David).

The only time republicanism appeared in Israel or Judah was during the Second Temple period under the Romans, and that was partly due to overreaction to the abuses of the Maccabean priest-kings. No human ruler should combine the roles of king, priest and prophet; only the Divine King Messiah is worthy of such an office. Republics and pure democracies historically have arisen in overreaction to people making just such combinations of their own accord.

Comment by rakkav




Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>